Long post... Apologies in advance.
I recently purchased a new rear tire and tube for my 09 750. Brought it to the dealership because I wanted it done right.
Immediately after the tire install the rear drum brake is making this low pitched squeal, more like a honk... Sounded a lot like a goose, no joke!
It did it even when I wasn't touching the brake...
I brought it back to the dealership 10 minutes later and a different tech (the shop manager) test rode it, said that it seemed "a little tight", and he adjusted the nut on the threaded rear brake rod.
That seemed to do the trick.
Then it only did the "goose call" when I used the rear brake... I figured the shoes were settling in, and that the noise would go away once they settled.
I went home, but the "goose call" continued intermittently.
Three days later I'm riding and tap the rear brake... Although it's engaging, the bike isn't really slowing down.
Luckily I have a 2012 Aero with the exact same drum brake to compare it with, and yeah, something is definitely screwy with the 09's rear brake.
Brought it back to the dealership today.
The tech who did the work wasn't available, so they asked a different tech to look at it.
The new tech said that my brake shoes had become glazed and needed to be replaced.
The service writer said he would only charge me for the parts and the time needed to swap the shoes, and that he wouldn't charge me for the time to take the rear wheel off, since they had just changed tire.
I think it was $103 all in (not counting previous tire change which was $108).
I kind of feel like I got shafted... Am I being paranoid?
I had no trouble with the brakes before they changed the rear tire. The bike has 17k miles on it, the last 7k miles put on by myself, so it seems a little early for the shoes to be done...
Also, about 1500 miles ago (last summer) I hired the same shop to flush and refill the brake juice. I had no brake problems at all until this new rear tire.
I understand that with an older bike, stuff can happen that's nobody's fault, but I have a gut feeling that my brakes only glazed over due to a poor adjustment by the previous tech, and even if they "only" charged my $103 to fix the brakes, that's not a repair I should be expected to pay for.
Of course, I didn't get any parts back, and I didn't ask. I'm not looking at legal recourse, but if this was obviously the shop's responsibility, I guess I need to find a new place to have my routine maintenance done.
Is my paying $103 to replace the glazed shoes fair under the circumstances? Or should I start looking for another shop?
I wish I had a garage and tools so I could do this stuff myself, but I don't...
There is a Kawasaki dealer in town that would love to sell me a new bike or two... lol
I recently purchased a new rear tire and tube for my 09 750. Brought it to the dealership because I wanted it done right.
Immediately after the tire install the rear drum brake is making this low pitched squeal, more like a honk... Sounded a lot like a goose, no joke!
It did it even when I wasn't touching the brake...
I brought it back to the dealership 10 minutes later and a different tech (the shop manager) test rode it, said that it seemed "a little tight", and he adjusted the nut on the threaded rear brake rod.
That seemed to do the trick.
Then it only did the "goose call" when I used the rear brake... I figured the shoes were settling in, and that the noise would go away once they settled.
I went home, but the "goose call" continued intermittently.
Three days later I'm riding and tap the rear brake... Although it's engaging, the bike isn't really slowing down.
Luckily I have a 2012 Aero with the exact same drum brake to compare it with, and yeah, something is definitely screwy with the 09's rear brake.
Brought it back to the dealership today.
The tech who did the work wasn't available, so they asked a different tech to look at it.
The new tech said that my brake shoes had become glazed and needed to be replaced.
The service writer said he would only charge me for the parts and the time needed to swap the shoes, and that he wouldn't charge me for the time to take the rear wheel off, since they had just changed tire.
I think it was $103 all in (not counting previous tire change which was $108).
I kind of feel like I got shafted... Am I being paranoid?
I had no trouble with the brakes before they changed the rear tire. The bike has 17k miles on it, the last 7k miles put on by myself, so it seems a little early for the shoes to be done...
Also, about 1500 miles ago (last summer) I hired the same shop to flush and refill the brake juice. I had no brake problems at all until this new rear tire.
I understand that with an older bike, stuff can happen that's nobody's fault, but I have a gut feeling that my brakes only glazed over due to a poor adjustment by the previous tech, and even if they "only" charged my $103 to fix the brakes, that's not a repair I should be expected to pay for.
Of course, I didn't get any parts back, and I didn't ask. I'm not looking at legal recourse, but if this was obviously the shop's responsibility, I guess I need to find a new place to have my routine maintenance done.
Is my paying $103 to replace the glazed shoes fair under the circumstances? Or should I start looking for another shop?
I wish I had a garage and tools so I could do this stuff myself, but I don't...
There is a Kawasaki dealer in town that would love to sell me a new bike or two... lol