I never once said anywhere I don't like Harley's....not once.
I only ever said, it would be nice to see them offer something different.
Never said you did. Everything is cool. I hear you. As a consumer, you certainly have the voice to state your desires.
You don't get it. You wouldn't keep going to a Chevy dealer and expect to by the same ecact car you bought 10 or 20 years ago.
What don't I get? That I should be clamoring for the latest technology coming from Milwaukee? Please tell me exactly what's wrong with me actually liking the looks, style and an air cooled engine? Push rods, pff sure, so what. I've owned several air cooled metric bikes, and surprisingly they all ran fine. As does the bike I currently own. AMF ran Harley into the ground. Had it not been for the employees who believed that HD could be ressurected, then they would have gone under. They relearned how to build bikes using modern manufacturing techniques like Kaizen, JIT and lean manufacturing. There's your modern technology.
Even if you could bolt new sheet metal on it to make it look fresh. IT'S STILL THE SAME DAMN CAR.
Ask any shade tree mechanic and they will tell you the cars of yester year were much easier to work on. Computer controlled, emissson laden packed in power trains of todays vehicles are the bees knees? I benefit how from all this modern water cooled stuff? Really?
Here was a bike that was really fast.
A brand new Honda CL77 305cc (18.64 cut in) could just about outrun a full dress Harley. That's a fact.
Great, awesome facts. Again, if I were looking for speed I'd be impressed. May I state for the record, AJ Foyt I am not. Maybe other than the Vrod, Harley's never laid claim that their bikes are built for speed. If I were looking for speed, you'd see me on a sport bike, VMax or some such. You won't see me on the track hauling my carcus around on my Sportster. Not interested. However, with the 1200 EVO, I roll the throttle and pass whatever I need to pass on the road with authority. That, as a bike owner, is what is important to me.
In 2009 the value of Harley Davidson brand fell by 43%. The fall in value is believed to be connected to the 66% drop in company profits in two quarters the previous year.
April 2010. Harley stated they had to cut $54 million in manufacturing costs from production facilities in Wisconsin. This came in the wake of a massive company wide restructuring which began in 2009. And involved the closing of two factories, one distribution center and the planed elimination of nearly 25% of its total workforce.
Yet they still hold their value better than any other bike out there, and since 2001, what large business hasn't been impacted and had to reduce costs. Harley doesn't own the corner of the market there.
And who's looking for a 79GS550 Air box anyway. The reason those parts aren't available is they quit building the bike. New improved better bikes came around and people moved on and bought them.
Ah, that would have been me. And I never found one. Not all of us can own this wonderful new technology you speak of. Some of us ride what we can afford.
Tell me, why is it that on any non-Harley motorcycle forum the debate is always "Harley vs Whoever". Why don't I see these lengthy, continual debates over Honda vs BMW or Honda vs Kawasaki, ad nauseum?
I'll take my tired, antiquated technology and happily ride on down the road.